深夜福利影视-深夜福利影院-深夜福利影院在线-深夜福利影院在线观看-深夜福利在线播放-深夜福利在线导航-深夜福利在线观看八区-深夜福利在线观看免费

【sex tong hop hay nhat】Enter to watch online.CNN said Hillary won the debate. Why do so many polls seem to say otherwise?

【sex tong hop hay nhat】Enter to watch online.CNN said Hillary won the debate. Why do so many polls seem to say otherwise?

On Monday night,sex tong hop hay nhat nearly all major news networks (including the conservative ones) seemed to agree: Hillary Clinton had won the first presidential debate.

But throughout the night and well into Tuesday morning, people on Twitter shared dozens of debate polls that seemingly concluded that Trump had won the debate. CNNmust have been biased against Trump. Pundits were elitists. The media conspiracy against Trump, in their minds, had never been more clear.

The science for their case, however, was far murkier.

SEE ALSO: #TrumpWon trends in the morning after the debate — with plenty of laughter

Take a look for example, at the polls shared by conservative news aggregation site, The Drudge Report. At the top of their list was a seemingly scientific post-debate poll claiming to come from ABC News. According to ABC News, Drudge claimed, 54% of respondents would now be voting for Trump, followed by 21% for Jill Stein, 15% for Gary Johnson, and just 10% for Hillary Clinton, despite the fact that Stein and Johnson didn't even compete in the debate.

The poll, which Drudge linked to and which was shared by some #TrumpWon supporters on Twitter, actually came from a fake ABC Newssite with the address "abcnewsgo.co," not the outlet's real site, "abcnews.go.com."

Other polls weren't so conclusive. Slate, Time, Breitbart, and CNBConline polls all gave the debate to Trump. Even though Slateand Timewarned their readers that their site's polls were mostly fun and unscientific ("Online reader polls like this one are not statistically representative of likely voters, and are not predictive of the debate outcome will effect the election," Time wrote), the numbers and the subsequent viral screenshots sharply contrasted with the dominant ("mainstream") narrative that Hillary had won.

But online polls can be easily manipulated, and it appears that 4chan /pol/, home to many on the alt-right, may have been involved. Earlier this morning, an anonymous user encouraged fellow members to vote for Trump on various post-debate polls. A screenshot of the board subsequently began to go viral on Twitter and yet another hypothesis -- or conspiracy theory, depending on your politics -- was born.

Mashable Trend Report Decode what’s viral, what’s next, and what it all means. Sign up for Mashable’s weekly Trend Report newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

Even if 4chan wasn't able to influence the post-debate polls, however, online polls like the ones shared above are generally regarded to be unscientific. It's not possible to immediately determine whether the voters participating in the poll are at all representative of the general population. Voters can vote more than once using different browsers. Though they can assess online voter enthusiasm (a potential serious obstacle for the Clinton campaign), they can't provide conclusive results.

Mass voter fraud may be a myth -- but online polls are far harder to monitor.

The CNN post-debate poll, on the other hand, claimed that 62% of voters claimed that Clinton won, compared to just 27% for Trump. As Nate Silver over at FiveThirtyEightpointed out, that's the third widest margin in a CNN or Gallup post-debate taken since 1984. Their poll, compared to web polls simply used for audience engagement, is generally regarded to be more scientific.

The poll itself isn't without flaws in design. The voters in the CNNpoll leaned Democratic by a margin of approximately 15%. Still, as CNNpointed out, 54% of independent voters in their poll gave Clinton the debate, and just 33% awarded it to Trump.

CNNconducts its poll with voters over the telephone (landline and cell) and estimates their margin for sampling error at 4.5 plus or minus percentage points.

Even with the data at hand, screenshots sometimes matter more than science in the eyes of certain voters. Throughout the morning, #TrumpWon continued to trend on Twitter -- and while some of those tweets were sarcastic, others were real.

There are dozens of polls out there that tell voters want they want to hear. Far fewer give them the data they need to know.

Bonus: Can you really trust political polls?

Latest Updates

主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产双飞在线观看 | 国产99精品成人午夜在线 | 99国产精品免费观看视频 | aⅴ无码中文字字幕 | 国产福利区一区二在线观看 | 高清无码国产精品区 | 精品2025露脸国产偷人在视频 | 2025国自产拍精品免费观看 | 国产主播一区二区三区在线观 | 国产精品户外野外 | 国产一级毛片视频网 | 91精品国| 成人精品免费视频在线观看 | 高清一区高清二区视频 | 精品福利在线 | av女人天堂 | av色原在线观看 | 国产精品日韩欧美一区二区三 | 国产精品一区2区三区内射 国产精品一区91 | 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品软件 | 国产a级三级三级三级 | 国产自产在线观看一区 | 国产精品麻豆专区 | 国产午夜亚洲精品一级 | 成人欧美一区二区三区在线视频 | 成人精品视频一区二区三区尤物 | 精品国产高清欧美操b视频 精品国产高清一区二区广区 | 国产另类ts人妖一区二区 | 国产超碰女人任你爽 | 国产国语对白露脸正在播放91 | 国产成人精品免费青青草原 | 99久久精品国产免看国产一区 | 2025无码专区 | 国产精品成人av在线不卡 | 国产一二三四区 | 成人自慰女黄网站免费大全 | 91免费精品国自产拍在线不卡 | 国产精品美女久久久久av爽 | 国产高清japanese国产 | 精品视频日本 | 精品国产一区二区三区国产馆杂枝 |